Some quick facts:
- Slaves could only be a witness to a crime if the crime was more severe than petty larceny and then only witness against another slave
- Killing or dismembering a Slave would bring the same punishment afforded as if he crime was against a white person, unless the killing or dismembering was in response to insurrection.
- Most of the punishments for whites or free mulettos socializing or attending meetings with slaves were cash forfeit, for the slaves, it was “stripes” or lashes from a whip.
- Slaves couldn’t own dogs or horses.
- “Cruel or unusual punishment” was prohibited on slaves
Let’s take this last line for sure. What exactly is “cruel and unusual” punishment? Whipping someone’s bare back with a whip not to exceed 39 times isn’t cruel? This shows a “non-human” mindset of those in favor of slavery, and it’s ok to whip your animals. That line was sarcastic to say the least. If slaves were the Master’s property, then why couldn’t they kill their slaves? There are many contradictions in the code as to what exactly they think of slave, are they human therefore equal? They bypass this question in paragraph 1.
The second paragraph was number 31, stating no person will teach a slave to read, spell, or write. Why would Master not want an educated Slave of whom could make better decisions? Probably because the slave would end up smarter than Master and outwit him. They were actually afraid of slaves education themselves, talking in more than 5 male slaves in a group (#37).
Deep down, I believe the proponents of slavery knew slavery was wrong and against what God taught in the bible. Many of the Southern plantation owners were “God-fearing” and knew the difference between right and wrong.

